Stefano Rainieri
← All work

Business case · UX/UI · SaaS

Docebo learning dashboard

The brief came with a persona already written: Julia, 30, sales rep, who knows her knowledge gaps and cannot easily show what she has learned. I designed an e-learning dashboard around her real problem, evidence of progress, rather than around course inventory.

Type
Self-directed business case, a brief taken on during a design selection process and run with my own method
Scope
Wireframes and interface for dashboard and courses
Persona
Supplied in the brief, not researched
Tools
Sketch
01

The brief

Docebo is a SaaS learning management system: companies use it to train employees, partners and customers. The brief asked for an engaging e-learning dashboard where a user can check the learning activity they have done on their company’s training platform.

Unusually, the brief supplied the persona. That is worth flagging rather than hiding: the empathise phase here was handed to me, and a persona I did not research is a persona I cannot fully defend.

02

The process, and what was real

01

Empathise

Partly delivered
  • Persona supplied with the brief
  • Interviews with corporate learners (proposed)
  • Platform analytics on course completion (proposed)
02

Define

Delivered
  • Needs and frustrations turned into design targets
03

Ideate

Delivered
  • Dashboard structure and content hierarchy
  • Split between “where am I” and “what next”
04

Prototype

Delivered
  • Wireframes for dashboard and courses
  • Interface for both screens
05

Test

Method proposed
  • Usability test with employees on a real platform (proposed)
  • Completion-rate comparison (proposed)
Deliveredproduced in this projectMethod proposedmethod I would run with access to users and stakeholders
03

Julia, as the brief describes her

Delivered supplied material, restated

What works for her

  • Hard worker, and actively pursues learning opportunities
  • Wants to demonstrate improvement
  • Wants guidance on career development
  • Wants an overview of how she is performing

What is in her way

  • She knows where her knowledge gaps are
  • She needs guidance to close them
  • Achievements are hard to demonstrate to others
  • Her own progress is hard to see

The insight I designed to

Every frustration on Julia’s list is about evidence, not about content. She does not need more courses. She needs to see her progress and be able to show it to somebody who decides on promotions. That turns a course catalogue into a proof-of-achievement tool.

Restated as a design target: give Julia an at-a-glance answer to “how am I doing?”, a credible next step, and something shareable at the end of it.

04

Wireframes

Delivered

Two screens carry the whole job: a dashboard that answers “where am I?” and a courses view that answers “what have I actually earned?”

Dashboard wireframe: greeting, courses in progress, new and suggested courses, statistics and agenda.
Courses wireframe: progress, achieved certificates, instructor contact.
05

Interface

Delivered

Dashboard: progress on active courses is the first thing on the page, statistics and agenda sit to the right, and new courses are a discrete, non-competing block.
Courses: certificates surfaced as objects Julia can reach and share, not buried in a completed-items list.

What each screen is doing

Dashboard

  • An engaging call to action that pushes discovery of new courses
  • A clear view of what is new and what is suggested for her
  • Progress and achievements given prominence over catalogue

Courses

  • Easy access to achieved certificates
  • The ability to share and demonstrate new skills
  • Engaging elements that reward working towards the next achievement
  • A route to contact course instructors for guidance
06

Looking back

Method proposed written now, looking back: what I would keep and what I would do differently with the experience I have today

Reading “evidence, not content” out of the persona is the move that makes this case study worth showing. It is the difference between decorating a brief and interpreting one.

What I’d do differently: I accepted the supplied persona without pressure-testing it, and Julia is suspiciously tidy. A persona with no contradictions is usually a marketing artefact rather than a research one. Today I would ask what she was built from, and I would design the sharing mechanism properly: “demonstrate achievements” implies a manager on the other end, and that person never appears in my design. There is a second screen missing here.